Mahesh Dattani play ' Where There is a Will'
"WHERE THERE’S A WILL"
-
Mahesh Dattani
The play ‘
Where There’s A Will’ by Mahesh Dattani. In 1986, he wrote his full length play
‘where there’s a will’.
In play ‘where there is a will’
we can see there are many characters. Characters like Hasmukh
Mehta , his wife Sonal Mehta, his son Ajit and his daughter-in-law
priti , Kiran Jaweri (mistress of Hasmukh Mehta). It is a Gujrati play. The
story started the death of Hasmukh
Mehta and he appears as a ghost. The family member the all are busy with own life. In the play
‘where there is a will’ mainly concentrate in the social issue.
As the play opens Ajit is on
the phone talking to a friend about his frustration as his father does not give
him Rs.5 Lakhs to modernize the factory. Here, we can see the relation between
father and son. Always Hasmukh Mehta keeps commenting on Ajit’s irresponsible
and crackpot schemes. And also we can find the confrontation between Hasmukh
and his son Ajit. The more he claims his right to prove his worth , Ajit
is taunted by his father as a good for nothing
saying,
“I am not
trying to humiliate you. I m trying to put some sense into you. Trying to fill
up empty space”
We can say
that Ajit exposes his father’s selfish motives due to depravity in childhood.
“Anything I do is wrong for you! Just because you are a
self-made man and had a deprived childhood…. Nothing I do will ever seem
intelligent to you . you are prejudiced”
Here, we
can find that Hasmukh keeps nagging ajit calling him a big zero and affirms
that he would ever remain so. The argument and counter argument between the due
end up with the father sleeping and ajit for disrespecting him.
However, in the play ‘ where there is
a will’ Mahesh Dattani also focus on the female character who are always busy
for work and preparing for dinner. Sonal and priti are always busy with the
making dinner. Sonal also makes orange flavored halva for ajit which irritates
her husband who is a diabetic. From the interaction of the characters it is evident
that they have no deep familial relationship.
In the play ‘ where there is a will’
Dattani also focus the comically scene. Sonal and priti talking with each
other at that time sonal ironically
comment on the meaning of ‘Hasmukh’
which means ‘a smiling face’. But here we can see her husband never
smiled, blaming her and her son for all his problems.
In the second part of the play, the
scene shifts to husmukh’s death. Here Dattani applying magic realism, Dattani
has very deftly brought in the scene to establish the protagonist’s patriarchal
hegemony even after death.
“I am dead. I
can see my own body lying still on the bed . looking peaceful , but dead”
At the ends with the arrival of
Kiran, husmukh’s mistress, who has come to stay in the house being named the
executrix of the will. Because they all are fighting with will. Kiran establishes her
indispensability as she has come to assist them
as per hasmukh’s will. By trying
to establish supreme control over his family through his money and will,
husmukh was only perpetrating the filthy tradition inherited from his father.
Somewhere the hegemony had to stop. Ajit revolts against patriarchy and
establishes his final victory.
At the end , they all are join hands
being victims of the same male domination and ruthless patriarchy. Dattani has
successfully explored like Ibsen some of the problem faced by patriarchal
societies that need purging of the ghosts of the past.
May conclude my point Dattani through
light on the gujrati family and in our
today life we can see the currant
problem in the 21st century. Though
written in the backdrop of a gujrati family, ‘where there is a will’ is
applicable to join-family system prevalent in several part of India. Also we
can say at the end of the play Kiran’s assessment of extreme patriarchal
control in husmukh as a substitute for his inadequacy as a man, finally
resolves the conflict among the characters and bring them together to derive
benefit from the Husmukh Will.
I can't get the last part
ReplyDeleteConclusion is not clear
ReplyDeleteNo conclusion
ReplyDeleteBest
ReplyDelete