Wednesday, 24 February 2016

”STOPPING BY WOODS ON A SNOWY EVENING” BY ROBERT FROST

                                       ”STOPPING BY WOODS ON A SNOWY EVENING”






                  Robert Frost wrote "Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening" around 1921. He died in 1963, so he had about forty-two years of life ahead of him on that winter night when he stopped to admire the beautiful winter scene. During those years he became America's best-loved poet. In 1961 he was honored by being invited to read one of his poems at John F. Kennedy's presidential inauguration.
             


                     “Stopping by Woods on a Snowy Evening” as simply a story about a weary traveler longing for the comforts of home, or even to allegorize it as the journey of Everyman, is to miss the subtle qualities that identify it as a Frost lyric. For one thing, Frost balances the onward rhythmic pull of the verse against the obvious stasis of the poetic scene itself: The speaker never arrives, nor really leaves; he is simply always stopping. Frost also arranges the natural scene so as to heighten the drama of the encounter and to reveal its symbolic density. Finally, Frost’s sense of dramatic and contextual irony undercut the simplicity of the narrative. After all, despite the speaker’s confident assurance about where he is going and the miles he has yet to go, his restiveness (projected onto the horse) and the vagueness of the future “promises” he must keep reveal his assurance to be, in a word, a fiction. This is an important point for Frost. Frost celebrated the necessity of imaginative extravagance in human affairs, but he knew well enough that the imagination traps as well as frees.

            

Tuesday, 23 February 2016

English as a world language

                         English as a world language



              English has been influenced by many languages of the world.  in return English has also influenced almost all languages of the world. it is due to the development of English culture, trade and science. the major reason is the dominance of America as a world power. so English claims for the title of world language. it has demanded the status of international language.

             It does not mean that English will replace the mother tongue of people. it will become the second language of people. to become world language English attempted the scientific constriction as :

1)               Esperanto
2)              Novial

          They proved artificial because language is a living organism while such construction are static. it is desirable to select a living language as an international expression. English becoming that lucky language. English language has two major difficulties. they become hurdles in the way of English as a world language. they are :

1)               The vast and complex vocabulary
2)              The lack of relationship between spelling and pronunciation.  

                    English has to improve them to became a world language. the lovers of English have introduced two method to settle his hurdles.  they are :

1)               Basic English
2)              Anglic English

1)               Basic English

                Basic English was invent by C.K.Ogden. he was a linguist. he tried it in several part of the world. in china , this experiment was successful . British government has made it an official scheme. basic English consist of 850 worlds. it’s aim is to express minimum think necessary thoughts, simple international conversation and translation . a few common international terms are added as hotel , radio…..etc… a few words like /take/ and /give/ are dropped from 850 words. it has made English as easy language to learn . it is a scientific selection. however it is not a natural growth. it lacked the quality of language . it lacks the liveness of English. it failed to interest people.

2)              Anglic English

           Anglic English is supposed to help foreigner in English spelling. it was introduced at first in Sweden . it was invented by prof. R. E. Zachrisson. it avoids the unnatural of basic English. it tries to simplify English spelling on phonetic lines. it does not take revolutionary departure from tradition. it is not new but followed more scientifically.

           English language changes continuously. there are symbolic and ideographic spelling. before changes the sound pattern the phonetic spelling seems outdated  besides symbolic and ideographic a few spelling depend on sound. so it is not worth trying. the pronunciation of the world differs from land to land. sometimes the spelling are also different in various parts. the experiment of anglic is not encouraging in other countries. in short time Norway has changed its spelling  thrice . thus anglic is not accepted whole heartedly by the world.

           Language is a medium of expression. thought, feelings and ides are spontaneous. it is hard of adjust them in a system of world. is it desirable for English to become a world medium. the question and answer if any, concern more to the student of social sciences and anthropology study of human be and less to the student of English language.


Monday, 22 February 2016

“Slumdog Millionaire” Directed by Danny Boyle

                                                   “Slumdog Millionaire”




              The movie “Slumdog millionaire”  is based on the novel “Q and A” by Vikas Swarup. The movie translated in 42 languages. It is the British film but use the Indian Background also luck play vital role. Also we can see the elapses technique use in this movie.


             The film “Slumdog millionaire” directed by Danny Boyle. It is the 2008 British drama film. The movie start with the character of Jamal malik. He was slum boy from the Juhu slum. The main character of  the entire film. Jamal malik was not intelligent but he has very intitutive boy.  Also we can find that the satire on rich and super class people. Also satire on acquirer’s language. Here, we can say that,

“his learning from life,
I educated for the life”

               Dubbed the feel good film of the decade, "Slumdog Millionaire" is the film to see. Excitement, tragedy, love and hate it's all featured together. The film starts by showing the poverty in India. The way that it does this is in a humorous but serious way and therefore still getting the point across. The film then goes into show how the poor and rich are living together; side by side and how there is a large divide between classes. Two Brothers Jamal Malik (Dev Patel) and Salim Malik (Mahur Mittal)are taken in by a villain who forces the children beg so that he makes money. They escape from this villain leaving behind them there friend Latika (Freida Pinto). After living rough the brothers manage to find Latika but they then become separated. Jamal ends up working in a call centre as a tea boy and this is how he locates his brother. He then knows that if he gets onto "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire" Latika will see him. Working at the call centre is then his gateway to "Who Wants to Be a Millionaire".



                   Slumdog Millionaire is the story of Jamal Malik, an 18 year-old orphan from the slums of Mumbai, who is about to experience the biggest day of his life. With the whole nation watching, he is just one question away from winning a staggering 20 million rupees on India’s “Who Wants To Be A Millionaire?”But when the show breaks for the night, police arrest him on suspicion of cheating; how could a street kid know so much? Desperate to prove his innocence, Jamal tells the story of his life in the slum where he and his brother grew up, of their adventures together on the road, of vicious encounters with local gangs, and of Latika, the girl he loved and lost. Each chapter of his story reveals the key to the answer to one of the game show’s questions. Intrigued by Jamal’s story, the jaded Police Inspector begins to wonder what a young man with no apparent desire for riches is really doing on this game show? When the new day dawns and Jamal returns to answer the final question, the Inspector and sixty million viewers are about to find out.

                  At last we can observe that, dishonest people are hero in this movie, how character of nation is build, and the great Indian people goes on the great and success dream , nation and narration how happens in this film, representation of character and nation, the portrayed of character is wonderfully saw the movie. 

Thursday, 11 February 2016

“Waiting For Barbarians” by J.M.Coetzee

                                              “Waiting For Barbarians” 

                                                         


               John Maxwell "J. M." Coetzee is a South African novelist, essayist, linguist, translator and recipient of the 2003 Nobel Prize in Literature. He relocated to Australia in 2002 and lives in Adelaide. He became an Australian citizen in 2006

              The novel “waiting for barbarians”  written by J.M.Coetzee. the novel depends about the violence and human cruelty. The novel “waiting for barbarians” is about morality and violence and about exploding in several ways. But in Coetzee’s word “waiting for barbarians” is a novel about “the impact of the fortune chamber on the life of a man of conscience”. Also the novel based on the fear and anxiety.

              The title “waiting for barbarians” is taken from a line from the Greek poet Constantine P. Cavafa. The  story of an imaginary Empire. But the empire destroyed own image also. Set in an unspecified place and time. The man conscience is the main protagonist, the Magistrate. The Magistrate is the central character in the novel. Magistrate as a man of Authority and Responsibility.


               However, also we can see the creation of barbarian girl as the representation of the other to problematize the attitude which perceives different as having no subjectivity. Also we can say that the barbarian girl sympathy for Magistrate .  the identity of “barbarians” will always to regarded. But as a member of the empire Magistrate feels guilty for the girl. He wanted to know the pain of girl and the tortured on physically or verbally. Exstream level of tortured the barbarian girl. She was a women so she must be protected her identity. According to Coetzee , torture room is a metaphor for relation between authoritarianism and its victims. But victim can’t speaking magistrate is like this he was victim so he can’t speak. Also we can see the whiteness is a black thing in Magistrate.

              Here, Coetzee highlights the true cruelty that humanity can inflict upon other humans in its pursuit of whatever seems to be the right thing as determined by those in power at any particular point in time. It need not make sense, it need not be morally defensible, it only need be possible and performable, and it may be done. In the regime at the time, such was the situation, South Africa, like so many other places has been a war torn place for a very long time.
   


The Swamp Dwellers By Wole Soyinka

                 The  Swamp Dwellers




             The play ‘ The Swamp Dwellers’ written by Wole Soyinka. Wole Soyinka has survived to write so much about the African experience is a wonder.

           The Swamp Dwellers is a play of worldwide appeal . it talk about distant rural and urban society, family life, conflict of old and new society, psychological conflict between old and young generations, love for modernity and love for the swamp the supernatural , unfavorable forces of nature and so many problems. He focuses on family ties , love for family hints of love in trivial quarrel between the married in the play.

           The play focuses on the struggle between old and the new ways of life in Africa. The play presents the picture of modern Africa where the wind of change started blowing. And also we can defined the  struggle between human beings and unfavorable forces of nature is also capture in the play. Soyinka says that it’s all about change in Africa.

         The Swamp Dwellers is primarily concerned about social changes. An easy access to shortly abundant all has caused the social changes and has an impact on human relationship in many African countries especially in Nigeria during mid Twentieth Century.

           However, also we can observe that the death of a twin Awachike ? what type of death is it ? natural or symbolic ?

         Wole Soyinka also talk about the tradition and modernity. Tradition and modernity is a liner theory of social change. The two polar opposite in the play. The modernity does not weaken the tradition. Tradition – a –  framework of nation wood. The relation  between tradition and modernity. Both are treated as polar opposites or binaries Makuri  begins to discuss the city,

“It rains them, the city rains them, what do they seek there expect money ?”

             In the very opening scene of the play we can see quarrels between Alu and Makuri. We see the hints of verbal bicker between the two old married Alu and Makuri. Alu seems more impatient than Makuri, and she is constantly nagging in the households. Alu has been waiting for long for her dear son and in her every household. Work she attempts to peep the doorways with great expectations of their sons return. Even the play starts with her question mingled with eagerness further son :
“Alu : can you see him ?”


          However, also we can defined that in the play there are two tragedy. and  also we can see all the characters are absurd and they all are victim of society also the wish of characters going to the individual world. And may be the death of wish in the Alu mind.

Wednesday, 10 February 2016

"A Grain Of Wheat" by Ngugi Wa Thiongo

                    A Grain Of Wheat



          NgÅ©gÄ© wa Thiong'o  born 5 January 1938) is a Kenyan writer, formerly working in English and now working in Gikuyu. His work includes novels, plays, short stories, and essays, ranging from literary and social criticism to children's literature. He is the founder and editor of the Gikuyu-language journal MÅ©tÄ©iri.


          The novel “A Grain Of Wheat’ written by Ngugi Wa thiongo. A novel is a combination of socio-psycho-cultural changes. And also we can see something is happened but people don’t know because the unconfused event. The novel is about the freedom. It’s covered the time of pre-colonialism to the post-colonialism and neo-colonialism. Also we can see the past-present-future through the characters how can we imagination to the future of characters like the character of Mugo. His past was very fragmented mugo was very normal human being. And form his childhood he was alone . however, also other characters like the Mumbi. Mumbi has a wife of Gikonyo and mother of Karnja’s child.  Karnja was an police officer. Her past like that. The coral between husband and wife. Mumbi says,

“you catch me if you can”

          Maumau emergency in A Grain Of Wheat presented for the first time an African perspective on the Kenyan armed revolt against British colonial rule during the 1950s.

          A Grain Of Wheat marked Ngugi’s break with cultural nationalism and his embarking of fanonist Marxism.In the novel ‘A Grain Of Wheat’ there are three movement in the novel like,

1)           Freedom
2)          Heroism of Mugo
3)           Revival of Kihika

        However, also we can see the pressure of colonialism. It is the allegorical story of one man’s mistaken heroism and a search for the betrayer of a MAUMAU leader.

        Ngugi Wa Thiongo portrayed the disruption of KIKAYA society. As a result of the invasive pressure of colonialism here, we can see so many people died in nation.

       The novel ‘ A Grain Of Wheat’ it is a political narrative and the political discourse the novel ending social the novel ending with positive way.

       The novel looks like the mask of grace. The novel is a collective act of recalling and reflecting on the events leading to Uhuru , in order in a understood what actual meaning it should be the Thabai peasant. A Grain Of Wheat constructs a narration of the nation. And the destroyed the common man life.


       The novel  ‘A Grain Of Wheat’ the village of Kenya . Kenya is the country of black people. In this novel we can see there are many issue but Ngugi Wa Thiongo not only focus on the other issue but they only focuses on native issue.

Tuesday, 9 February 2016

My short view about the Movie "Hamlet" by Kenneth Branagh

 I enjoyed the movie ‘Hamlet’ very much. Hamlet was one of the great tragedy.




1) Yes, I m surely that this movie is as faithful as original play. In this movie the director Kenneth branagh presented the effective dialogue , different character , soliloquies and many thing presented in the original play .



2) Yes , after watching the movie our perception about play, character or situation is changed. The character of Claudius introduced movie his died in throne but the text not clearly declare that he died on the throne…

   3)Yes, we feel ‘aesthetic delight’ during watching  the   movie ‘Hamlet’ . if the prince of  Hamlet as sometime   react as a mad man.


 4) Yes, we feel ‘Catharsis’ during watching the movie ‘Hamlet’ . the scene in the nunnery scene . when hamlet rudely behaviour of Ophelia , and she is much madness because her father, polonius death. While the other scene of hamlet while scene of grave digging when prince hamlet know the Ophelia was died.


5)Yes, definitely screening of movie help us in better way to understand play.

6) Yes, we may particular scene or moment in the movie hamlet. Their devotion to each other is such that hamlet , before he also dies .Horatio wants to kill himself because his bosom friend is dying but hamlet stops him,
                             “Hamlet spoke with breath      
                               In pain to tell my story
                               You must live”
                                                       ( Act-5, scene-2 )
 If their everything is dies but friendship is present……………….

7)Suppose I m director , I m create and changed character of Gertrude.

8) It show the beginning of the movie first scene of the statue of hamlet father and end of the play they all are died of hamlet familiar then their hamlet as  ruler . so, that  father hamlet statue down to the earth and hummured down to the dust. It is a cycling prosses.

9)During studying the play and watching the movie I would  found the philosophical approach in the movie. as we know that ‘Hamlet’ as a tragedy. Hamlet was a student of philosophy. The most striking quality of hamlet is perhaps ,his philosophical nature and his intellectual depth. This quality is clearly seen in all his soliloquies .

10)Before watching the movie I found feminism approach for this play . hamlet generalize “frailty, thy name is women “, but hamlet meditates upon the revelation that the ghost has made. And he now regard his mother as a “most pernicious women”


Saturday, 6 February 2016

“Oliver Twist” by Charles Dickens

                                   “Oliver Twist” by Charles Dickens




                Oliver Twist was the second novel by Charles Dickens. It's a coming-of-age story about an orphan. It's one of the most famous works by Dickens, known for its portrayal of criminals. Here are a few quotes fromOliver Twist. Here, in this novel we can see the more appropriate word like,

"Please, sir, I want some more."
It is spoken by Oliver Twist.

                  Oliver is born in a workhouse in the first half of the nineteenth century. His mother dies during his birth, and he is sent to an orphanage (where he is poorly treated). Along with the other orphans, Oliver is regularly beaten and poorly fed. In a famous episode, he walks up to the the stern authoritarian, Mr. Bumble, and asks for more. For this impertinence, he is put out of the workhouse. He then runs away from the family who take him in. He wants to find his fortune in London. Instead, he falls in with a boy called Jack Dawkins, who is part of a child gang of thieves--run by Fagin.

                 Oliver is brought into the gang and trained as a pickpocket. When he goes out on his first job, he runs away and is nearly sent to prison. However, the kindness of the person who was robbed, saves him from the terrors of the city gaol, and instead he is taken into the philanthropic gentleman's home. However, as soon as he thinks he is settled, Bill Sikes and Nancy (two members of the gang) takes him back.

"Do you think Nancy and me has got nothing else to do with our precious time but to spend it in scouting arter, and kidnapping, every young boy as gets grabbed through you? Give it here, you avaricious old skeleton, give it here!"
n Oliver Twist

                 Oliver Twist is probably not the most brilliantly delving psychological novel, but then it's not supposed to be. Rather, Oliver Twist gives us an impression of the social situation at the time it was written, and is does so with a Hogarthian gusto. Mr. Bumble, the beadle, is an excellent example of Dickens' broad characterization at work. Bumble is a overlarge, terrifying figure: a tin-pot Hitler, who is both frightening to the boys under his control, and also slightly pathetic in his need to maintain his power over them.

                Fagin, too, is a wonderful example of Dickens ability to draw a caricature and place it in a story that moves quickly and always keeps our attention. Less the pantomime villain that is portrayed in a number of its adaptations, there is a streak of cruelty in Dickens' Fagin, with a sly charisma that has makes him such a lasting archetype.

"If that's the eye of the law, the law is a bachelor; and the worst I wish the law is, that his eye may be opened by experience — by experience."

Thursday, 4 February 2016

Silas Marner By George Eliot

              

               Silas Marner By George Eliot


            George Eliot was born Mary Anne Evans in Warwickshire on the 22nd of November, 1819. The daughter of a successful artisan and land agent, Mary Anne grew up to become one of the most popular novelists of the 19th century, adored by Queen Victoria, Charles Dickens and Charles Darwin, amongst many others. ‘She really was one of the most sceptical, unusual creatures I ever knew,' wrote one of her admirers.

              George Eliot’s novels, Silas Marner is set in the rural England of the author’s childhood memories. Like her other novels, too, the work is meticulously realistic in many aspects of its dialogue, description, and characterization. Unlike most of her novels, however, Silas Marner is very short, with an almost geometrically formal structure, and its plot relies upon some rather improbable incidents. Such elements reflect the author’s intent to deal with profound themes in the form of a fable.

              In Silas’ story, George Eliot obliquely approaches the realm of spiritual truth by depicting the restoration of faith in the heart of a very simple man. The old-fashioned rural setting is important as a frame; its cultural remoteness from the world of the reader gives it the archaic simplicity and uncontested credibility of a fable or fairy tale. Even so, George Eliot critics have never been comfortable with the implication that somehow Eppie has been given to Silas by a benevolent providence in return for his lost gold. The question of the author’s stance is especially problematic in view of her own agnosticism. Although George Eliot herself as a child was an ardent, evangelical Christian, in maturity (like many Victorian intellectuals) she rejected traditional beliefs for a humanist credo.

                 If the metaphysical implications of Silas Marner go beyond the realm of earthly reality, the primary moral intent of the author is firmly grounded in human relationships. As is the case in her other novels, the bonds of love, sympathy, and fellow feeling are the highest good that one can truly know. As such, they are redemptive in themselves and are the basis of George Eliot’s “religion of humanity.” Although she doubts the existence of God, she is assured of the existence of a sublime, collective goodness. Thus, in both stories, the power of human affection, especially as shown by the women of the novel, heals psychic wounds, restores humanity, and, insofar as it can, atones for wrongdoing. In Godfrey’s story, it is Nancy who serves in this role. She is a “centered” personality who counterbalances Godfrey’s lack of inner strength; her love for him unites her sensitive, affectionate nature with her deep moral principles. In Silas’ story, Dolly Winthrop and, later, Eppie, perform comparable functions. Dolly’s good sense and warm sympathy provide Silas with a lifeline to a restored faith in humanity and God. Eppie’s decision at the end to remain with Silas reflects the strength of their shared affection and affirms the bonds of feeling as the surest basis of right choice.


Arms and the Man By George Bernard Shaw

             Arms and the Man By George Bernard Shaw 




                  George Bernard Shaw (26 July 1856 – 2 November 1950) was a Nobel Prize and Oscar-winning Irish playwright, critic and socialist whose influence on Western theatre, culture and politics stretched from the 1880s to his death in 1950. Originally earning his way as an influential London music and theatre critic, Shaw's greatest gift was for the modern drama. Strongly influenced by Henrik Ibsen, he successfully introduced a new realism into English-language drama. He wrote more than 60 plays, among them Man and Superman, Mrs. Warren's Profession, Major Barbara, Saint Joan, Caesar and Cleopatra, and Pygmalion. With his range from biting contemporary satire to historical allegory, Shaw became the leading comedy dramatist of his generation and one of the most important playwrights in the English language since the 17th century.

             Arms and the Man, subtitled An Anti-Romantic Comedy, is most obviously an attack on the false ideals of warfare and the soldier’s profession. Late nineteenth century British society, especially the aristocratic element, tended to see war as a noble undertaking and soldiers as brave, courageous, fearless, and honorable. Many military melodramas of the period upheld these ideals, but they were performed for a civilian audience. As George Bernard Shaw has Bluntschli make clear, soldiers themselves do not think this way. Although far from being a pacifist, Shaw demands that war be seen honestly: War makes men tired and hungry, afraid and nervous. In the person of Bluntschli and in his comments about battle, Shaw establishes the opposition with the archromantics of the play, Raina and Sergius. The satire of the play is aimed at the poetic view of war and soldiers and at the commonplace conjunction between soldiers, aristocracy, and love, the staples of the standard military melodrama of the period. When Raina chooses for her mate the practical, professional, middle-class Bluntschli, Shaw breaks the pattern in which only the brave deserve the fair.

            The key elements of the play are really contained in Sergius and Raina, rather than in Bluntschli. Bluntschli never changes in the course of the play; he is the standard against which the others are measured. Raina learns to divest herself of her impossible ideals, ideals that have no relation to real life, and thus becomes a fit partner for the cool and efficient Bluntschli. Sergius believes that he is to be despised because he finds himself unable to match his ideals. Sergius never does come to see the lesson taught by Bluntschli—that the problem is not an inability to live up to ideals but an acceptance of impossible ideals as reasonable and real.

               Arms and the Man is a piercing satire and it is full of laughter and humor. At the same time it is extremely thought-provoking.Actually I think that book is so interesting because in this book , view  of love and war is the main think with  comedic .  Bluntschli is a Swiss solider who fall in love with Raina but she is already against with Sergius. But sergius love louka. At last the comedy of the story turn into tragedy and story builds as we wonder how this love triangle will unravel. i think no one can know what happed at last without finishing the story.

               Arms and the Man is an important play for Shaw because it is the first of his plays to be a public success. In this play, Shaw makes his first fairly direct attack upon false idealism, an attack aimed not so much at conscience as at attitudes. Certainly, the play elicits more laughter than any of Shaw’s other plays, either before or after. In contrast to the other plays, the laughter in Arms and the Man tends to be more agreeable to many because Shaw uses so many of the traditional devices of comedy.

              The play is also important because it marks the shift from Shaw’s earlier propagandistic plays on social topics to more benign-seeming attacks on the romantic, idealistic follies of humankind. The social reformer of the earlier plays has shifted methods, though not goals, realizing that he must change attitudes before he can appeal to consciences. Whether propagandist or anti-idealist, however, Shaw does not simply want idle laughter. He maintains that it is easy to make people laugh—he wants to make people think.
          



The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare

                    The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare
            
                                                     

                     William Shakespeare was an English poet, playwright, and actor, widely regarded as the greatest writer in the English language and the world's pre-eminent dramatist. He is often called England'snational poet, and the "Bard of Avon".His extant works, including collaborations, consist of approximately 38 plays,154 sonnets, two long narrative poems, and a few other verses, some of uncertain authorship. His plays have been translated into every major living language and are performed more often than those of any other playwright.

                  The Taming of the Shrew is in fact a play within a play. The larger framework involves a drunkard named Christopher Sly, who stumbles out of an inn and falls into a deep sleep. A Lord passing by notices Sly and decides to play a trick on him. Sly is carried to the Lord's bedchamber and decked in lavish attire. When he awakes, the Lord's attendants refer to him as to a nobleman. The Lord's Page plays the part of the wife, overjoyed to see that her husband has finally recovered from a dire fifteen-year illness due to which he had been under the impression he was a beggar. A troupe of actors have stopped at the Lord's house to put on a performance, and they unwittingly become part of the ruse as well. Sly, after some protest, decides he must indeed be a lord, and watches the show as if it were performed in his honor.
So begins the play proper. Lucentio, son of a wealthy Pisan named Vincentio, has arrived in the university town of Padua to pursue his education. His dreams of virtuous enlightenment fall by the wayside, however, when he lays eyes on Bianca, the younger daughter of the well-off Baptista. Bianca has two suitors - the young Hortensio and an old fool named Gremio. Baptista has ordained that he will not give his child away to marriage until her elder sister is wed. The problem is, that sister is Katharina, an ill-tempered, feisty, and quarrelsome "shrew." All hope seems lost for Hortensio and Gremio until Petruchio, a gentleman of Verona, arrives on the scene. When Hortensio mentions Katharina - and adds that her father is quite wealthy - Petruchio immediately declares his interest in making her his wife.

                     Lucentio, in the meantime, has devised a plan with his servant,Tranio. Since Baptista is looking for schoolmasters to instruct Bianca, Lucentio disguises himself as Cambio, a Latin teacher, while Tranio plays the role of the master. Hortensio gets the same idea and dresses himself up as a music teacher named Litio in order to access Bianca. Thus the wooers descend on the Baptista household. Tranio, in his noble guise, becomes another official suitor for Bianca's hand, while "Cambio" and "Litio" embed themselves inside. Petruchio, for his part, eagerly awaits the arrival of Katharina; the stories of her shrewishness only further his excitement.

                When she does finally appear, the two would-be lovers engage in a furious battle of wits. When Baptista, Tranio, and Gremio enter, Petruchio delightedly informs them that he and Katharina are to be wed on Sunday, despite her protestations. As soon as it appears that Katharina will be married, Baptista turns to Bianca's suitors, asking which of them could provide the richest dowry. Tranio guarantees more than Gremio is able, but Baptista insists upon receiving Vincentio's assurance that the money will be paid. Tranio hatches a plan to feign the assurance by dressing someone up as Vincentio. In the meantime, Lucentio, while playing the part of a Latin instructor, is able to declare his passion for Bianca. She is more partial to him than to "Litio," whose advances she dismisses.

                Katharina and Petruchio's wedding proceeds hastily and wildly. Petruchio behaves like a tyrant during the service and then refuses even to let Katharina stay for the wedding feast, instead sweeping her away to his home in the country. There, Petruchio plays the part of an odious master. He refuses to help Katharina when she falls from her horse, beats and berates his servants, and denies his wife food and sleep. He reveals his plan to starve Katharina into submission - to out-shrew her as it were - all under the guise of kindness and love.

                   Back at Baptista's, Tranio, witnessing the flirtation between Lucentio and Bianca, persuades Hortensio to call off his wooing of her. The two men vow never to court her again, and Hortensio declares that he will wed a wealthy widow instead. Tranio communicates the good news to the lovers, and then proceeds to solve the problem of Vincentio's assurance. Finding a traveling Pedant from Mantua, he convinces the old man that all Mantuans in Padua are to be put to death, and suggests that the Pedant disguise himself as the Pisan Vincentio. The Pedant readily agrees and assures Baptista that Bianca will receive a sufficient dower. Baptista is satisfied and allows the wedding.
Meanwhile, at Petruchio's house, Katharina emerges as polite and gracious in comparison to her husband. After insulting a Haberdasher and Tailor who have come to present their wears, Petruchio sets off with his wife to Padua. They come across the real Vincentio, who is shocked to hear that his son Lucentio has married Bianca. The party arrives in Padua just after Lucentio and Bianca have stolen away to the church. In Padua, Vincentio confronts the Pedant who is impersonating him. Finally, Lucentio, returning from the church, pleads for his father's forgiveness. Vincentio, still fuming, grants his assurance to Baptista and the marriage between Lucentio and Bianca is settled.
In the final scene of the play, the newlyweds all gather at Lucentio's house. The men propose a wager to see which of their three wives - Kate, Bianca or the Widow - is most obedient to her husband. Both Lucentio and Hortensio summon their wives only to be snubbed. Katharina, however, comes at Petruchio's beckoning. The "veriest shrew," in Baptista's words (5.2: 64), thus emerges as the most obedient wife of all. Katharina delivers a speech detailing a wife's duty to her husband, and so the play ends.